Added to sovereign-tool-stack.md: Red Team & Adversary Simulation: - Sliver: open-source C2 replacing Cobalt Strike for adversary simulation - Stratus Red Team: executes real cloud attack techniques (AWS/Azure/GCP) - CloudFox: attacker-view cloud privilege mapping and exploitation Container & Runtime Security: - Falco: runtime threat detection for Kubernetes and Linux - Tetragon: eBPF-based security observability (noted as alternative) Endpoint Forensics & IR: - Velociraptor: remote forensic artefact collection and hunting across thousands of endpoints via VQL Threat Intelligence: - OpenCTI: structured threat actor/TTP/IOC correlation from Filigran Deception: - OpenCanary: lightweight honeypot for early network reconnaissance warning Code & Secrets Security: - GitLeaks: scans repositories for hardcoded secrets - Semgrep: lightweight static analysis with full data sovereignty Email Security Testing: - GoPhish: open-source phishing simulation and user training Certificate Monitoring: - CertStream + crt.sh: real-time and historical certificate transparency monitoring for subdomain discovery Updated: Complete Capability Matrix, Per-Module Tool Pairing (Module 9 and 10 now include extended tools), Deployment Complexity table, and Integration With Existing Frameworks cross-references.
41 KiB
The Sovereign Tool Stack: Open-Source Arsenal for Antifragile Consulting
"We do not sell software. We operate a laboratory. Every tool in our stack is either open-source, client-owned, or built by us. The result is intelligence that no vendor can replicate because it is tuned to your specific environment."
This document provides the complete capability map for our consulting practice: the tools we deploy, why we chose them, how they integrate, and what gaps remain. It is designed for three audiences:
- Clients who want to understand what we bring to an engagement
- Consultants who need to select the right tool for the right module
- Our own product team who are building ASTRAL and AOC to close the M365-native gap
The Philosophy: Sovereign Means Inspectable
| Vendor Black Box | Sovereign Tool |
|---|---|
| Proprietary detection logic you cannot audit | Open-source code you can read, modify, and extend |
| Data exfiltrated to vendor cloud | Data stays in your infrastructure or ours |
| Vendor-defined scan scope and cadence | You control what is scanned, when, and how deeply |
| Generic report templates | Custom outputs tuned to your compliance and risk language |
| Per-asset licensing that scales poorly | Free or built-by-us; economics favour the client |
The executive framing:
"Tenable is a rented microscope. Our stack is a laboratory. We can ask questions that Tenable never thought to ask because we own the queries, the data, and the integration logic. When we find a gap, we do not open a support ticket. We write a detection rule, a query, or a script—and it is yours forever."
Our Current Arsenal
Cloud Posture and Compliance
Prowler
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| What it does | Multi-cloud security auditing for AWS, Azure, and GCP. 300+ checks against CIS benchmarks, PCI-DSS, ISO 27001, GDPR, and HIPAA. |
| Why we use it | It is the most mature open-source CSPM. One tool covers all three major clouds. Output is JSON/CSV/HTML—easy to feed into our reporting pipeline. |
| Antifragile pillar | Sovereign Intelligence, Stress-to-Signal Conversion |
| Engagement modules | Module 3 (M365 Security Hardening) for Azure; Module 8 (OT Security Assessment) for cloud-connected OT; any cloud-native client |
| Typical output | Executive dashboard: "247 findings across 12 services; 23 critical; 5 are internet-facing misconfigurations" |
| Integration | Output feeds into AI-assisted TVM prioritization and CISO Assistant compliance tracking |
The conversation:
"Prowler audited your AWS estate in 45 minutes and found an S3 bucket with public read access containing backup files. That is not a theoretical risk. That is a data breach waiting for a journalist. We fixed it in 10 minutes. No vendor invoice."
Active Directory Attack Path Analysis
BloodHound
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| What it does | Maps Active Directory attack paths using graph theory. Shows how an attacker moves from a compromised standard user to Domain Admin in your specific environment. |
| Why we use it | No commercial tool visualises AD trust relationships and permission chains as clearly. It turns abstract identity risk into a navigable map. |
| Antifragile pillar | Structural Decoupling, Sovereign Intelligence |
| Engagement modules | Module 6 (On-Premise AD Hardening); Module 10 (Red Team & Validation); kill chain assessments |
| Typical output | "There are 4,217 paths from standard users to Domain Admin. The shortest is 3 hops via an overprivileged service account. Here is the exact account, the exact permission, and the exact remediation." |
| Integration | Findings feed into T0 Asset Framework classification and remediation prioritisation |
The conversation:
"Your AD has been growing for 15 years. Nobody remembers why the payroll service account has Replicating Directory Changes permissions. BloodHound remembers. It found 4,217 paths from a standard user to Domain Admin. The shortest is three hops. We are not guessing about AD security anymore."
Active Directory Security Assessment
Purple Knight / Forest Druid
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| What it does | Automated AD security assessment against known vulnerability classes: credential exposure, privileged access gaps, replication security, Kerberos weaknesses, and LDAP/S channel hardening. |
| Why we use it | Purple Knight (Semperis) and Forest Druid provide rapid, scriptable AD health checks that complement BloodHound's graph analysis with rule-based security scoring. Forest Druid extends coverage to hybrid Entra ID configurations. |
| Antifragile pillar | Stress-to-Signal Conversion, Optionality Preservation |
| Engagement modules | Module 6 (On-Premise AD Hardening); Module 12 (Blue/Purple Team Foundation); diagnostic week 1 kill chain assessments |
| Typical output | AD security score with pass/fail against 50+ indicators; immediate remediation guidance for failed checks |
| Integration | Scores feed into antifragile risk register; trended across quarterly retests |
The conversation:
"Purple Knight scanned your AD forest in 20 minutes and scored 62 out of 100. The failures were not exotic: default LDAP signing disabled, KRBTGT password older than 180 days, and 14 service accounts with SPNs vulnerable to Kerberoasting. These are fixable in a week. Here is the priority order."
Governance, Risk, and Compliance
CISO Assistant
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| What it does | Open-source GRC platform for compliance mapping, risk register management, control evidence collection, and audit readiness tracking. |
| Why we use it | It replaces €50,000/year GRC platforms with a sovereign alternative. Maps controls to multiple frameworks simultaneously (ISO 27001, NIS2, DORA, SOC 2). |
| Antifragile pillar | Sovereign Intelligence, Asymmetric Payoff Design |
| Engagement modules | Module 4 (Data Governance); Module 11 (Embedded Quality); all compliance-driven clients |
| Typical output | Live compliance dashboard: "DORA Article 12: 14 of 17 controls evidence-complete; 3 gaps assigned to owners with due dates" |
| Integration | Pulls findings from Prowler, osquery, BloodHound, and AOC into unified evidence packages |
The conversation:
"Your auditor wants evidence that you monitor privileged access. CISO Assistant links the BloodHound scan, the Purple Knight score, the AOC admin activity report, and the osquery listening-ports query into a single evidence package for DORA Article 8. No scrambling for screenshots the night before the audit."
M365 Backup and Change Management
ASTRAL (Our Platform)
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| What it does | Intelligent backup, configuration drift detection, and change management for Microsoft Intune, Entra ID, and M365 tenant configurations. Captures baseline state, detects unauthorised or accidental changes, and enables rapid rollback. |
| Why we built it | No existing tool treats M365 configuration as code. A tenant with 500 conditional access policies, 200 Intune profiles, and 50 compliance policies is unmanageable without version control and drift detection. ASTRAL provides GitOps for M365. |
| Antifragile pillar | Structural Decoupling, Stress-to-Signal Conversion |
| Engagement modules | Module 1 (Endpoint Management); Module 2 (Identity Security); Module 3 (M365 Security Hardening); retained capability engagements |
| Typical output | "Configuration drift detected: 3 conditional access policies modified outside change window; 1 Intune profile deleted; all changes attributable to [admin account]; rollback initiated automatically" |
| Integration | Feeds change logs into AOC for audit intelligence; exports configuration state to CISO Assistant for compliance evidence |
The conversation:
"Your M365 tenant has 400 configuration objects and no version control. When an admin accidentally deletes a conditional access policy at 2 AM, you discover it 6 hours later because users are complaining. ASTRAL detects the deletion in 60 seconds, attributes it to the specific admin session, and offers one-click rollback. This is not backup. This is configuration immunity."
M365 Audit Log Intelligence
AOC — Admin Operations Center (Our Platform)
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| What it does | Correlates Microsoft 365 Unified Audit Log, Entra ID sign-in logs, and Intune operational logs into actionable intelligence. Detects anomalous admin behaviour, privilege escalation, shadow IT creation, and data exfiltration patterns. |
| Why we built it | The native M365 audit log is a firehose: 10,000+ events per day in a typical tenant, searchable only via slow PowerShell or expensive Sentinel. AOC extracts the 50 events that matter and enriches them with identity context, device state, and business impact. |
| Antifragile pillar | Sovereign Intelligence, Stress-to-Signal Conversion |
| Engagement modules | Module 12 (Blue/Purple Team Foundation); retained capability (Detection Engineering); all M365 hardening engagements |
| Typical output | Daily brief: "3 anomalous events flagged: Global Admin [X] added external user at 03:14; Exchange Admin [Y] exported 12,000 mailboxes; Service Principal [Z] granted Mail.Read to unverified publisher. All require validation within 4 hours." |
| Integration | Receives alerts from osquery/FleetDM, Wazuh, and Prowler; pushes cases to CISO Assistant for risk register tracking; enriches AI-assisted TVM with insider-threat context |
The conversation:
"Microsoft gives you the audit log. They do not give you the story. AOC reads 50,000 events per night and tells you the three that need human attention: an admin added an external user at 3 AM, another exported 12,000 mailboxes, and a service principal granted Mail.Read to an unverified app. These are not false positives. These are the events that precede breaches."
The Stack Architecture
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ EXECUTIVE DASHBOARD │
│ (CISO Assistant + AI synthesis → board-ready risk and compliance view) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
▲
┌───────────────┬───────────────┼───────────────┬───────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐
│ Prowler │ │BloodHound│ │ ASTRAL │ │ AOC │ │ osquery │
│(Cloud) │ │ (AD) │ │ (M365) │ │(Audit) │ │(Endpoint)│
└────┬────┘ └────┬────┘ └────┬────┘ └────┬────┘ └────┬────┘
│ │ │ │ │
└─────────────┴─────────────┴─────────────┴─────────────┘
▼
┌─────────────────────────┐
│ AI-Assisted TVM Engine │
│ (Prioritisation + │
│ remediation scripts) │
└─────────────────────────┘
▼
┌─────────────────────────┐
│ Purple Team Validation │
│ (Did the fix work? │
│ Can we still exploit?) │
└─────────────────────────┘
Data flow:
- Discovery layer (Prowler, BloodHound, osquery, ASTRAL) collects raw security state
- Intelligence layer (AOC, AI-assisted TVM) correlates, enriches, and prioritises
- Governance layer (CISO Assistant) maps findings to compliance frameworks and tracks remediation
- Validation layer (Purple Knight, Forest Druid, purple team exercises) proves fixes work
Gap Analysis: What We Recommend Adding
Our current stack covers cloud posture, AD security, GRC, M365 configuration, and endpoint audit intelligence. Here are the gaps and our recommended closes:
Gap 1: Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) — The Visibility Gap
Current state: osquery provides structured endpoint inventory and compliance. AOC ingests M365 audit logs. What is missing is real-time behavioural detection on the endpoint itself.
Recommended close: Wazuh + Sysmon (open-source EDR stack)
| Why Wazuh | Why Sysmon |
|---|---|
| Centralised SIEM/XDR with 5,000+ detection rules | Windows endpoint telemetry at kernel level |
| Agent-based or agentless deployment | Maps directly to MITRE ATT&CK |
| Native integration with Threat Intel (MISP, VirusTotal) | Free, mature, extensively documented |
| Scales to 100,000+ endpoints | Outputs to any SIEM via standard formats |
Deployment model: Wazuh server in client infrastructure (or ours as managed service); Sysmon on all Windows endpoints with SwiftOnSecurity config; Linux agents via Wazuh native agent. Cost: infrastructure only.
When to deploy: Module 1 (Endpoint Management) for E3 clients lacking Defender for Endpoint P2; Module 12 (Blue/Purple Team) as the detection engineering foundation.
Gap 2: Security Orchestration and Automated Response (SOAR) — The Response Gap
Current state: AOC detects anomalous admin behaviour. ASTRAL detects configuration drift. What is missing is automated response: disabling a compromised account, isolating a device, or revoking an OAuth grant at machine speed.
Recommended close: Shuffle (open-source SOAR)
| Why Shuffle |
|---|
| Visual workflow builder (no code required for simple playbooks) |
| Native integrations with M365, Entra ID, Wazuh, TheHive, Slack |
| Self-hosted: data never leaves client infrastructure |
| Replaces €100,000+/year commercial SOAR platforms |
Example playbook: AOC detects impossible-travel sign-in → Shuffle disables account → ASTRAL revokes all active sessions → Slack alerts SOC → CISO Assistant logs incident → Ticket created in client ITSM.
When to deploy: Module 12 (Blue/Purple Team Foundation); retained capability engagements.
Gap 3: Incident Response Case Management — The Coordination Gap
Current state: Findings are scattered across Prowler, BloodHound, AOC, and osquery. What is missing is a single case management system that tracks incidents from detection through remediation to post-mortem.
Recommended close: TheHive + Cortex (open-source SOC case management)
| Why TheHive | Why Cortex |
|---|---|
| Case management with IOC tracking, task assignment, and timeline | Automated analysis of observables: hashes, IPs, domains, files |
| Native MISP integration for threat intel correlation | 30+ analyzers (VirusTotal, AbuseIPDB, URLhaus, etc.) |
| Metrics dashboard: MTTR, case volume, analyst workload | Free, extensible, community-maintained |
When to deploy: Module 12 (Blue/Purple Team Foundation); retained capability ( Detection Engineering).
Gap 4: Cloud Asset and Dependency Mapping — The Context Gap
Current state: Prowler finds misconfigurations. BloodHound maps AD attack paths. What is missing is a unified map of how cloud resources connect to each other and to on-premise assets.
Recommended close: Cartography (by Lyft, open-source)
| Why Cartography |
|---|
| Neo4j-based graph of AWS, GCP, Azure, and GitHub assets |
| Shows dependency chains: compromised IAM role → S3 bucket → Lambda → RDS |
| Complements BloodHound: BloodHound maps identity; Cartography maps infrastructure |
| Free, queryable via Cypher (same language as BloodHound) |
When to deploy: Module 3 (M365 Security Hardening) for Azure environments; Module 5 (AI Sovereignty Bridge) for infrastructure mapping.
Gap 5: Container and Supply Chain Security — The Modernisation Gap
Current state: Our vulnerability discovery covers servers and endpoints. What is missing is native container image scanning, SBOM generation, and supply chain integrity verification.
Recommended close: Syft + Grype + Trivy
| Tool | Role |
|---|---|
| Syft | Generate SBOMs from container images, filesystems, and archives |
| Grype | Scan SBOMs against NVD and vendor advisory databases |
| Trivy | Comprehensive scanner: OS packages, language dependencies, IaC misconfigs, secrets |
Already in repository: See Zero-Budget Vulnerability Discovery for the Syft → Grype pipeline.
When to deploy: Any client with containerised workloads; Module 9 (Organisational Resilience) for CI/CD security gates.
Gap 6: Network Traffic Analysis — The Blind Spot Gap
Current state: We see endpoint state (osquery) and cloud configurations (Prowler). What is missing is visibility into network traffic: lateral movement, C2 beacons, and data exfiltration at the packet level.
Recommended close: Zeek + Suricata
| Why Zeek | Why Suricata |
|---|---|
| Protocol analysis: extracts metadata from HTTP, DNS, TLS, SMB without full packet storage | IDS/IPS with 30,000+ signatures and emerging threat rules |
| Scales to 10 Gbps+ on commodity hardware | Can drop malicious traffic inline (IPS mode) |
| Output is structured JSON—easy to feed into Wazuh or AOC | Native file extraction and malware detection |
When to deploy: Module 8 (OT Security Assessment) for industrial network segmentation validation; Module 12 (Blue/Purple Team) for detection engineering.
Complete Capability Matrix
| Capability | Our Tool | Open-Source Alternative | Commercial Equivalent | When to Recommend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud posture management | Prowler | ScoutSuite, CloudSploit | Prisma Cloud, Wiz, Orca | Every cloud environment; first sweep |
| AD attack path analysis | BloodHound | — (none comparable) | — | Every on-premise or hybrid AD |
| AD security assessment | Purple Knight / Forest Druid | PingCastle, ADRecon | Semperis Directory Services Protector | AD hardening engagements |
| GRC and compliance | CISO Assistant | OpenGRC, SimpleRisk | ServiceNow GRC, RSA Archer | DORA, NIS2, SOC 2 clients |
| M365 backup/change mgmt | ASTRAL | — (no open-source equivalent) | Veeam, AvePoint, SkyKick | All M365 clients; retained capability |
| M365 audit intelligence | AOC | — (no open-source equivalent) | Microsoft Sentinel, ManageEngine | All M365 clients; SOC co-management |
| Endpoint inventory | osquery + FleetDM | Wazuh (limited), Zentral | Tenable, Qualys | 50-5,000 endpoints; sovereign preference |
| Endpoint detection (EDR) | Wazuh + Sysmon | — | CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Defender P2 | E3 clients without Defender P2; air-gapped environments |
| SIEM / log aggregation | Wazuh | Graylog, Grafana Loki, ELK | Splunk, Sentinel, QRadar | All environments needing centralised alerting |
| SOAR / automation | Shuffle | — | Palo Alto XSOAR, Splunk SOAR | SOC operationalisation; retained capability |
| SOC case management | TheHive + Cortex | — | ServiceNow SecOps, D3 | Blue/purple team foundation; MSSP co-management |
| Container security | Syft + Grype + Trivy | Clair, Anchore | Snyk, Aqua | Containerised workloads; DevSecOps |
| Network analysis | Zeek + Suricata | — | Corelight, Darktrace | OT environments; high-sensitivity networks |
| Cloud asset mapping | Cartography | CloudQuery | Lucidscale, Faddom | Complex multi-cloud; incident response |
| Perimeter scanning | Nuclei + Amass + Naabu | OpenVAS, Greenbone | Tenable.asm, Cortex Xpanse | External attack surface management |
| Vulnerability discovery | osquery + Grype | OpenVAS, Nessus Essentials | Tenable, Qualys | Zero-budget first sweep; continuous monitoring |
| Red team C2 | Sliver | Mythic | Cobalt Strike | Adversary simulation; EDR efficacy testing |
| Cloud attack simulation | Stratus Red Team | — | — | Cloud red team; Azure/AWS assessments |
| Cloud privilege analysis | CloudFox | PMapper | — | Cloud penetration tests |
| Container runtime detection | Falco | Tetragon | Aqua Runtime, Twistlock | Kubernetes workloads |
| Endpoint forensics | Velociraptor | KAPE | Encase, FTK | Incident response; threat hunting |
| Threat intelligence platform | OpenCTI | MISP, Yeti | ThreatConnect, Anomali | SOC maturity; regulated industries |
| Honeypot / deception | OpenCanary | T-Pot | Thinkst Canary | Flat networks; OT/IT bridges |
| Secrets detection | GitLeaks | TruffleHog | GitGuardian | DevSecOps; supply chain |
| Static code analysis | Semgrep | Bandit, Brakeman | SonarQube, Snyk Code | CI/CD security gates |
| Phishing simulation | GoPhish | — | KnowBe4, Cofense | Awareness programmes |
| Certificate monitoring | CertStream + crt.sh | Sublist3r | Censys, SecurityTrails | Continuous perimeter monitoring |
Per-Module Tool Pairing
Module 1: Endpoint Management Foundation
Primary: ASTRAL (Intune configuration backup and drift detection) + osquery/FleetDM (endpoint inventory) Augmentation: Wazuh + Sysmon (for E3 clients without Defender P2)
Module 2: M365 Identity Security
Primary: AOC (audit log intelligence) + BloodHound (hybrid identity attack paths) Augmentation: Purple Knight (AD security baseline)
Module 3: M365 Security Hardening
Primary: ASTRAL (configuration state) + Prowler (Azure posture) Augmentation: AOC (continuous monitoring of security control changes)
Module 6: On-Premise AD Hardening
Primary: BloodHound + Purple Knight / Forest Druid Augmentation: osquery (endpoint state of domain controllers)
Module 9: Organisational Resilience and DevSecOps
Primary: Falco (container runtime security) + Semgrep (static code analysis) + GitLeaks (secrets detection) Augmentation: Syft + Grype + Trivy (supply chain scanning); Shuffle (CI/CD security automation)
Module 10: Red Team & Validation
Primary: BloodHound (attack path validation) + Nuclei (external validation) + Sliver (adversary simulation) Augmentation: Stratus Red Team (cloud attack simulation); CloudFox (cloud privilege escalation); Zeek + Suricata (detect red team activity from blue team perspective); OpenCanary (deception and early warning)
Module 12: Blue/Purple Team Foundation
Primary: Wazuh + Sysmon + TheHive + Cortex + Shuffle Augmentation: AOC (M365-specific detections) + Velociraptor (endpoint forensics) + OpenCanary (deception) + OpenCTI (threat intel correlation)
Retained Capability: Detection Engineering
Primary: Wazuh (rule authoring) + AOC (M365 detections) + Shuffle (response playbooks) Augmentation: Zeek + Suricata (network detection rules)
Deployment Complexity
| Tool | Time to First Value | Infrastructure Required | Expertise Required | Client Data Sensitivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prowler | 1 hour | None (runs from consultant laptop) | Low | Low (read-only API) |
| BloodHound | 2 hours | None (collector + laptop) | Medium | Medium (AD enumeration) |
| Purple Knight | 30 minutes | None | Low | Medium (AD scan) |
| CISO Assistant | 1 day | Docker host or VM | Low | Low-Medium (compliance data) |
| ASTRAL | 2 hours | SaaS or client-hosted | Low | High (M365 configuration) |
| AOC | 4 hours | SaaS or client-hosted | Medium | High (audit logs, identity data) |
| osquery + FleetDM | 4 hours | FleetDM server + agents | Medium | High (endpoint data) |
| Wazuh + Sysmon | 1 day | Wazuh server + agents | Medium | High (endpoint + network data) |
| Shuffle | 4 hours | Docker host | Medium | High (SOAR playbooks) |
| TheHive + Cortex | 4 hours | Docker host | Medium | High (case data) |
| Syft + Grype | 1 hour | None | Low | Low (container metadata) |
| Zeek + Suricata | 1 day | Network tap or SPAN port | High | High (network traffic) |
| Cartography | 4 hours | Neo4j + AWS/GCP/Azure APIs | Medium | Medium (cloud metadata) |
| Sliver | 2 hours | C2 server (cloud or on-prem) | High | High (red team infrastructure) |
| Stratus Red Team | 1 hour | AWS/Azure/GCP CLI access | Medium | High (executes real attacks) |
| CloudFox | 1 hour | None (runs from laptop) | Medium | Medium (cloud metadata) |
| Falco | 4 hours | Kubernetes daemonset or Linux host | Medium | High (container runtime data) |
| Velociraptor | 4 hours | Velociraptor server + agents | Medium | High (forensic artefacts) |
| OpenCTI | 1 day | Docker host or VM | Medium | Medium (threat intel data) |
| OpenCanary | 30 minutes | Any Linux/Windows host | Low | Low (honeypot only) |
| GitLeaks | 30 minutes | None (CLI or CI/CD) | Low | Medium (source code access) |
| Semgrep | 1 hour | None (CLI or CI/CD) | Low | Medium (source code access) |
| GoPhish | 2 hours | Docker host or VM | Low | Medium (user email data) |
Extended Arsenal: Advanced and Specialised Tools
Beyond the core stack, these tools address specific niches that arise in sophisticated engagements. They are not deployed on every client, but when the situation demands them, no commercial alternative comes close.
Red Team and Adversary Simulation
Sliver
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| What it does | Open-source cross-platform adversary simulation and command-and-control (C2) framework. Replaces Cobalt Strike for red team engagements at zero licensing cost. |
| Why we use it | Cobalt Strike costs €30,000+/year and is fingerprinted by most EDR. Sliver is free, actively maintained by Bishop Fox, and supports DNS, HTTPS, mutual TLS, and WireGuard C2 channels. It generates implants for Windows, macOS, and Linux. |
| When to deploy | Module 10 (Red Team & Validation); purple team exercises; EDR efficacy testing |
| Integration | Red team activity detected by Wazuh + Sysmon feeds into TheHive cases; AOC correlates any M365 session anomalies with red team timing |
The conversation:
"We ran a controlled adversary simulation against your environment using Sliver. Your EDR detected 3 of 7 techniques. Your MSSP never saw the lateral movement. Your SIEM has no alert for the credential dumping. These are not theoretical gaps. These are tomorrow's breach headlines. Here is the detection engineering backlog to close them."
Stratus Red Team
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| What it does | Generates real cloud attack techniques against AWS, Azure, and GCP. Not a scanner—an actual attack simulator that executes TTPs and then cleans up. |
| Why we use it | Prowler finds misconfigurations. Stratus proves they are exploitable. It automates the gap between "this S3 bucket is public" and "we exfiltrated 2 GB of data from it and your cloud trail logged nothing useful." |
| When to deploy | Module 10 (Red Team); cloud security assessments; purple team exercises in Azure/AWS environments |
| Integration | Attack telemetry feeds into Wazuh/SIEM for detection validation; findings enrich AI-assisted TVM cloud risk scores |
CloudFox
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| What it does | Cloud exploitation framework for AWS, Azure, and GCP. Maps permissions, finds privilege escalation paths, and identifies exposed resources from an attacker's perspective. |
| Why we use it | Prowler audits from the compliance perspective. CloudFox thinks like an attacker: "I have this IAM role—what can I actually do with it?" It finds indirect privilege escalation paths that scanners miss. |
| When to deploy | Module 10 (Red Team); cloud penetration tests; Azure/AWS security assessments |
| Integration | Output feeds into Cartography for unified cloud attack path mapping |
Container and Cloud-Native Runtime Security
Falco
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| What it does | Runtime security detection for containers, Kubernetes, and Linux hosts. Uses system call monitoring to detect anomalous behaviour: unexpected outbound connections, privileged container escapes, sensitive file access. |
| Why we use it | Syft + Grype find vulnerable packages at build time. Falco detects exploitation at runtime. Without Falco, a container with a CVE can be exploited silently. |
| When to deploy | Any client with Kubernetes or containerised workloads; Module 9 (Organisational Resilience) for CI/CD security gates |
| Integration | Falco alerts feed into Wazuh or directly to TheHive; AOC correlates container events with M365 identity context for supply-chain attack detection |
Tetragon
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| What it does | eBPF-based security observability and runtime enforcement for Kubernetes and Linux. Provides process execution tracing, network monitoring, and file access detection at kernel level with minimal overhead. |
| Why we use it | From the creators of Cilium. More granular than Falco in some dimensions. Can kill processes in real-time (not just detect). Ideal for high-security environments that need active runtime protection without commercial agents. |
| When to deploy | Critical infrastructure; financial services; high-sensitivity Kubernetes environments |
Endpoint Forensics and Incident Response
Velociraptor
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| What it does | Endpoint visibility and digital forensics platform. Hunts across thousands of endpoints in seconds using VQL (Velociraptor Query Language). Collects files, memory artefacts, registry keys, and event logs remotely. |
| Why we use it | osquery gives you structured inventory. Velociraptor gives you forensic capability: extract the MFT, hunt for specific malware indicators, collect browser history, or dump credentials from memory—across the entire estate in minutes. |
| When to deploy | Incident response retainers; Module 12 (Blue/Purple Team); any engagement where forensic artefact collection is required |
| Integration | Hunt results feed into TheHive cases; file hashes submitted to Cortex analyzers; YARA rules shared with Wazuh |
The conversation:
"A user reported a suspicious email. Three hours later, we used Velociraptor to hunt across 2,000 endpoints and found four machines with the same payload in memory. We extracted the payload, analysed it in Cortex, and determined it was a new variant of a known banking trojan. Total time from alert to attribution: 47 minutes. No endpoint agent was installed on those machines. Velociraptor collected everything remotely."
Threat Intelligence
OpenCTI
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| What it does | Open-source threat intelligence platform from Filigran. Ingests, structures, and correlates threat data from MISP, CVE databases, vendor advisories, and OSINT feeds. Provides relationship mapping between threat actors, TTPs, IOCs, and victimology. |
| Why we use it | Most organisations collect threat intel but cannot use it. OpenCTI turns raw IOCs into structured intelligence: "APT29 uses this technique → which targets our industry → and exploits this CVE → which we have on 12 servers." |
| When to deploy | Module 12 (Blue/Purple Team); retained capability engagements; clients in regulated industries with threat intel mandates |
| Integration | MISP feed ingestion; Wazuh rules enriched with OpenCTI context; TheHive cases auto-populated with threat actor profiles |
Deception and Early Warning
OpenCanary
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| What it does | Lightweight, low-interaction honeypot daemon. Simulates services (SMB, RDP, SSH, HTTP, SQL, Git) and alerts when probed. Takes 10 minutes to deploy. |
| Why we use it | Every network has blind spots. An attacker scanning for RDP on port 3389 will hit OpenCanary first—and trigger an alert before reaching real systems. It is an asymmetric defence: 10 minutes of deployment for early warning that no EDR can replicate. |
| When to deploy | Module 6 (AD Hardening); Module 12 (Blue/Purple Team); any client with flat network topology or legacy protocols |
| Integration | Alerts feed into Wazuh or directly to Shuffle for automated response (isolate attacker IP, notify SOC) |
Code and Secrets Security
GitLeaks
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| What it does | Scans Git repositories for hardcoded secrets: API keys, passwords, tokens, private keys. Supports pre-commit hooks and CI/CD integration. |
| Why we use it | The most common cloud breach vector is not zero-day exploitation. It is a developer committing an AWS access key to GitHub. GitLeaks finds it before the commit—or scans historical commits for existing leakage. |
| When to deploy | Module 9 (Organisational Resilience); DevSecOps engagements; any client with active software development |
| Integration | CI/CD pipeline integration; findings fed into CISO Assistant for evidence tracking; AOC monitors for any M365 session using leaked credentials |
Semgrep
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| What it does | Lightweight static analysis engine that scans code for security vulnerabilities, dangerous patterns, and compliance violations. Supports 30+ languages and runs locally without sending code to cloud services. |
| Why we use it | SonarQube and Snyk are excellent but expensive and cloud-dependent. Semgrep provides equivalent coverage for common vulnerability classes with full data sovereignty. The rules are open and auditable. |
| When to deploy | DevSecOps engagements; Module 9 (Organisational Resilience); software supply chain assessments |
| Integration | CI/CD pipeline gating; findings correlated with SBOMs from Syft for complete supply chain visibility |
Phishing Simulation and Email Security Testing
GoPhish
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| What it does | Open-source phishing simulation framework. Build campaigns, track click rates, capture credentials (in training mode), and measure user susceptibility over time. |
| Why we use it | Commercial phishing platforms cost €5-15/user/year. GoPhish is free, self-hosted, and produces equivalent metrics. It integrates with LDAP for realistic email targeting. |
| When to deploy | Module 3 (M365 Security Hardening); security awareness programmes; post-incident user training |
| Integration | Results feed into CISO Assistant for training evidence; high-risk users flagged in AOC for enhanced monitoring |
Certificate and Subdomain Monitoring
CertStream + Crt.sh
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| What it does | CertStream monitors certificate transparency logs in real-time; crt.sh provides historical certificate search. Together they reveal subdomains, infrastructure changes, and unauthorised certificates issued for client domains. |
| Why we use it | Attackers register subdomains for phishing campaigns. Developers register subdomains they forget to secure. Certificate monitoring finds both before they become incidents. |
| When to deploy | Perimeter scanning engagements; shadow IT discovery; continuous external monitoring |
| Integration | New subdomains feed into Nuclei for immediate vulnerability scanning; findings enrich perimeter scanning reports |
Complete Extended Arsenal Matrix
| Capability | Tool | Gap Filled | When to Deploy |
|---|---|---|---|
| C2 / Adversary simulation | Sliver | Cobalt Strike replacement; EDR efficacy testing | Red team; purple team |
| Cloud attack simulation | Stratus Red Team | Proves cloud misconfigs are exploitable, not just visible | Cloud red team; Azure/AWS assessments |
| Cloud privilege analysis | CloudFox | Attacker-view cloud permission mapping | Cloud penetration tests |
| Container runtime detection | Falco | Detects container exploitation at runtime | Kubernetes workloads |
| eBPF runtime enforcement | Tetragon | Kernel-level process killing and tracing | Critical infrastructure K8s |
| Endpoint forensics | Velociraptor | Remote artefact collection and hunting | Incident response; threat hunting |
| Threat intelligence platform | OpenCTI | Structured threat actor/TTP/IOC correlation | SOC maturity; regulated industries |
| Honeypot / deception | OpenCanary | Early warning for network reconnaissance | Flat networks; OT/IT bridges |
| Secrets detection | GitLeaks | Hardcoded credentials in source code | DevSecOps; supply chain |
| Static code analysis | Semgrep | Vulnerability detection without cloud dependency | CI/CD security gates |
| Phishing simulation | GoPhish | User susceptibility measurement and training | Awareness programmes |
| Certificate monitoring | CertStream + crt.sh | Subdomain discovery and unauthorised certs | Continuous perimeter monitoring |
The Honest Limitations
| What Our Stack Does Well | What It Cannot Do |
|---|---|
| Provides complete visibility without vendor lock-in | Requires more expertise to deploy and maintain than commercial SaaS |
| Costs a fraction of commercial equivalents | Does not come with 24/7 vendor support (we provide that) |
| Customisable to client-specific needs | Customisation takes time; commercial tools are faster to deploy out-of-the-box |
| Data sovereignty by default | Some clients' procurement departments prefer vendor-backed solutions for audit comfort |
| Integrates across tools via open APIs | Integration requires engineering; commercial suites are pre-integrated |
The framing:
"Our stack is not for everyone. If you want a dashboard that takes 15 minutes to deploy and requires no expertise, buy CrowdStrike. If you want intelligence that answers questions no vendor thought to ask, and you want to own that intelligence forever, our stack is the right choice. We provide the expertise so you do not need to hire it."
Integration With Existing Frameworks
| Document | Integration |
|---|---|
| Zero-Budget Vulnerability Discovery | Syft + Grype container pipeline; osquery endpoint discovery; Prowler cloud-native discovery; GitLeaks secrets scanning |
| AI-Assisted TVM Blueprint | All discovery tools feed the AI prioritisation engine; AOC provides insider-threat context; OpenCTI enriches with threat actor context |
| Perimeter Scanning Capability | Nuclei + Amass + Naabu form the open-source active scanning layer; Prowler covers cloud perimeter; CertStream monitors for new subdomains |
| Osquery: The Sovereign Discovery Platform | osquery + FleetDM is the endpoint discovery layer; Wazuh extends to behavioural detection; Velociraptor adds forensic hunting |
| Blue/Purple Team Foundation | Wazuh + TheHive + Cortex + Shuffle form the open-source SOC stack; AOC adds M365-specific detection; Sliver enables adversary simulation; OpenCanary provides deception |
| Retained Capability | Detection Engineering retained capability is built on Wazuh + AOC + Shuffle; Threat Context on TheHive + Cortex + OpenCTI |
| Modular Engagements | Each module has a recommended tool pairing in the matrix above |
| AD and Endpoint Hardening | BloodHound maps attack paths; Purple Knight / Forest Druid score AD security; Velociraptor hunts forIndicators of Compromise on domain controllers |
For the cloud-native vulnerability discovery methods, see Zero-Budget Vulnerability Discovery. For the endpoint discovery platform, see Osquery: The Sovereign Discovery Platform. For the AI prioritisation layer that consumes these tools' output, see AI-Assisted TVM Blueprint. For the organisational model that operates this stack, see Retained Capability.