# Kosmic License (KΛ-1.0) - Compatibility and Interpretation FAQ

Plain-language guidance for using materials licensed under `KΛ-1.0`.

This FAQ is a project interpretation aid, not legal advice.
When stakes are high, consult qualified legal counsel.

## 1. What does KΛ-1.0 require at minimum?

For reuse or derivatives, keep all of the following:

- visible attribution to Church of Kosmo
- reference to `KΛ-1.0`
- open/shareable downstream distribution under the same or a compatible license
- no use that promotes violence, misinformation, or destruction of life/ecosystems

## 2. What attribution format should I use?

Use the canonical notice from `LICENSE.md`:

> Based on materials from the Church of Kosmo, shared under the Kosmic License (KΛ 1.0).

Recommended attribution package:

1. Include the canonical notice above.
2. Link to the source repository or source document.
3. State whether you modified the content (for example: "adapted", "translated", "edited").
4. Include a link or copy of the license text.

Example (Markdown):

```markdown
Based on materials from the Church of Kosmo, shared under the Kosmic License (KΛ 1.0).
Source: https://git.cqre.net/kosmo/Church-of-Kosmo
Changes: Czech translation and formatting edits.
License: ./LICENSE.md
```

## 3. What counts as a derivative?

Typical derivatives include:

- translations
- edited or rearranged versions of texts
- excerpts embedded into new guides or publications
- adaptations into visual, audio, or educational formats

If in doubt, treat your output as a derivative and include full attribution.

## 4. What does "same or compatible license" mean here?

Project interpretation of compatibility:

- preserves attribution requirements
- keeps derivatives open/shareable (no downstream lock-up)
- does not remove ethical-use constraints of KΛ-1.0
- does not claim exclusive ownership of material derived from KΛ-1.0 sources

Likely incompatible patterns:

- all-rights-reserved redistribution of derivatives
- no-derivatives terms on adapted KΛ-1.0 material
- licenses that allow removing attribution
- relicensing that strips ethical stewardship constraints

## 5. Is commercial use allowed?

Yes, but with explicit boundaries from `LICENSE.md`:

- commercial activity must align with ecological and ethical balance
- materials must not be used for harm, exploitation, or misinformation
- profits should contribute to education, preservation, or renewal in spirit with the Codex

Practical check before commercial use:

1. Can you clearly document attribution and open-share obligations?
2. Can you explain ecological/social impact of the use?
3. Are you avoiding harmful, deceptive, or extractive outcomes?
4. Is part of value returned to education/preservation/renewal?

If any answer is "no", stop and revise.

## 6. How should mixed-license projects handle KΛ-1.0 content?

If your project combines multiple licenses:

- keep KΛ-1.0 covered material clearly identified
- retain KΛ-1.0 terms for that portion
- avoid combinations that block attribution or open-share obligations

If terms conflict, do not distribute until the conflict is resolved.

## 7. Does this FAQ replace LICENSE.md?

No.
`LICENSE.md` is authoritative.
This file only clarifies practical interpretation for contributors and reusers.