Seasonal Intelligence: restructure into A Day's Walk + Seasonal Intelligence

Theory revised and narrowed to what the evidence supports; renamed The
Relevance Theory. Project split into two books and six essays, with the
three-tier relevance model promoted to the flagship.

- EVIDENCE.md   claims sorted into four tiers, governs what may be claimed
- CRAFT.md      lyric/landscape register, governs how it may be said
- PORTFOLIO.md  the two-book plus six-essay split, and what was cut
- BOOK_ONE_CHAPTERS.md  walk spine on the Stezka Ceskou Kanadou,
                        beats for all 14 units, argument ledger
- FIELD_BRIEF.md        what to capture on the trail
- drafts/       prologue, ch 3, ch 5 (register tests, specifics are placeholders)
- archive/      original theory and outline, unchanged

Cut: the foreign-policy argument, the weight-loss protocol, the diagnostic
scoring, the I/me labels, the seasonal network mapping (demoted to metaphor
in Book Two).

BOOK_TWO_OUTLINE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+# Book Two — *Seasonal Intelligence*
+
+*Designing a Year You Can Live In*
+**Czech:** *Sezónní inteligence: Jak si navrhnout rok, ve kterém se dá žít*
+
+**Length:** 60–70k words · 10 chapters
+**Write after:** Book One, and after a year of collecting the case studies Part III needs.
+
+---
+
+## The reframe — read this before anything else
+
+The original version claimed the DMN/TPN/SN cycle maps onto the calendar year. **It doesn't, as far as anyone knows, and the closest real evidence points elsewhere:** Meyer et al. 2016 found attention-related brain activity peaking near the *summer* solstice and working-memory activity near the *autumn* equinox — a seasonal pattern, but not yours. And the seasonality of mood is itself contested: Traffanstedt et al. 2016 found no relationship between depression and season, latitude, or sunlight in a large sample.
+
+So the book cannot be *"your brain has seasons."*
+
+It becomes: **every society before ours built structure into the year; we flattened it; rebuilding it is a design choice worth making.** Cultural history and practical design, honest that it is a proposal rather than a finding.
+
+This is a stronger book, not a weaker one. "Here is a structure worth adopting" needs no neuroscience to justify it and cannot be falsified out from under you. It also opens a real gap: Katherine May's *Wintering* is memoir, Jenny Odell's *Saving Time* is critique, and neither hands the reader a year to actually build.
+
+**The seasonal/network mapping survives as an explicitly labelled design metaphor** — a way of naming four modes of work and giving them a place in the calendar. Declare it as metaphor in chapter 5 and never let it drift back into a claim.
+
+---
+
+## Part I — The Flattened Year
+
+### 1. The Year That Had Shape
+What a pre-industrial European agricultural year actually contained: not four moods, but wildly different kinds of labour, sociality, diet, and obligation in each part. Be concrete and unromantic — winter was mending, slaughtering, weaving, and often hunger; it was not a season of contemplative rest for anyone. The structure was real; the serenity is a modern projection.
+
+### 2. Ritual as Infrastructure
+Feast, fast, harvest, fallow. Why every society marked the year, and what the markers did — synchronising a community, licensing rest, bounding effort, ending things. Cross-cultural, with the Slavic and central European calendar as the home ground you can write from directly.
+
+The functional argument: rituals were the *interface* to seasonal structure. Remove them and the structure becomes invisible even where it still exists.
+
+### 3. How We Flattened It
+Artificial light, climate control, global supply chains, the fiscal year, the modern work calendar. Not a decline narrative — most of these are genuine goods and the book should say so loudly. But we removed the year's structure as a side-effect of removing its hardships, and never asked whether the structure was doing anything on its own.
+
+### 4. The Middle of the Night
+*Handle the dispute openly — it's the best part.* Ekirch's documentation of segmented sleep in pre-industrial Europe; Yetish et al.'s finding of no such pattern in three equatorial pre-industrial societies; Ekirch's response that he never claimed universality.
+
+The chapter's real subject is what that argument reveals: a habit we assumed was human nature turns out to be Western European and historically local. Which is the book's thesis in miniature — the structures we lost were *cultural inventions*, not biological defaults, and that makes them things we can deliberately rebuild rather than things we must recover.
+
+---
+
+## Part II — Four Modes, Four Seasons
+*Explicitly a design metaphor. Say so at the top of chapter 5 and again whenever it strains.*
+
+### 5. Why Four
+The honest chapter. Here is what the evidence supports (the brain varies across the year; light affects physiology), here is what it doesn't (this specific mapping), and here is why a four-part structure is still worth adopting: not because it is discovered, but because a year with named parts is easier to live in than a year without them, and four is the division our culture already carries.
+
+Address the latitude problem head-on: this is an argument about temperate, seasonal, northern-hemisphere life, and it does not generalise to the equator. Owning that limitation in chapter 5 is worth more than pretending to universality.
+
+### 6. Winter — Integration and Closure
+Not new beginnings. Reflection, consolidation, repair, finishing. Why January is a poor time to launch a changed life — as a design and cultural argument, not a neurological one. Winter rituals across cultures.
+
+### 7. Spring — Orientation
+Looking outward again. Light commitments, low-cost experiments, learning without deliverables. Why spring beginnings recur in so many calendars.
+
+### 8. Summer — Output and Freedom
+Long light, high energy, sociability, the season of making things. The traditional vacation season, and the question of whether we placed rest correctly.
+
+### 9. Autumn — Harvest and Delivery
+Narrowing, completing, documenting, letting go. Closure as maintenance rather than as loss.
+
+---
+
+## Part III — Building the Year
+*Needs real case studies. This is what the year between Book One and Book Two is for — interview consultants, small-business owners, school-teachers, and parents who already run seasonal rhythms, formally or not.*
+
+### 10. A Year You Can Actually Build
+The applied chapter, absorbing the old Part III entirely. Personal year design; the team and organisational version; the fiscal-year misalignment argument (made carefully — as a design critique with evidence from real organisations, not as a claim about brains); families and the school year; and the question of what to do when your employer owns your calendar.
+
+End on the honest constraint: most readers cannot restructure their working year. What they can restructure is what they *expect of themselves* in each part of it, and that alone is most of the benefit.
+
+---
+
+## Conclusion — Rhythm as a Choice
+
+Not nostalgia, not escape, not a claim that our ancestors were wiser. A year with shape is a thing you can build inside a modern life, and the reason to build it is that the alternative — a year that is one long undifferentiated stretch of the same expectation — is a very recent experiment that nobody chose and nobody has evaluated.
+
+---
+
+## Appendices
+- Seasonal planning templates: individual, team, leadership
+- A seasonal festival calendar: Slavic, central European, secular, universal
+- Further reading
+
+---
+
+## Standing rules for this book
+
+1. **No brain-state claims about seasons.** The metaphor is declared once and stays a metaphor.
+2. **Meet the contested seasonality evidence in chapter 5**, before a skeptical reader can raise it. Never bury it.
+3. **Unromantic about the past.** Pre-industrial winters were hard. The argument is about structure, not about a lost golden age — and the book is far more persuasive for saying so.
+4. **Northern temperate, and admit it.**