Files
antifragile/antifragile-consulting/assessment-templates/README.md
T
tomas.kracmar 64f73371c9 feat: Add engagement model, consultant field guide, deliverable templates, CQRE tools integration, and Czech localization
New documents:
- core/engagement-model.md: Full client-facing engagement lifecycle (Sections 1-6) plus consultant delivery discipline (Section 7)
- core/consultant-field-guide.md: Decision models, client qualification, module selection, 10 common mistakes, technical onboarding, proposal writing
- core/about-cqre.md: Company overview template with [PLACEHOLDER] markers for client-facing use
- core/about-cqre-cs.md: Czech version of company overview (O společnosti CQRE)
- core/executive-summary-cs.md: Czech translation of the board executive summary
- assessment-templates/nist-csf-baseline.md: Full Brownhat Diagnostic workshop methodology (NIST CSF 2.0)
- assessment-templates/nist-csf-baseline-cs.md: Czech version of Brownhat Diagnostic (for Czech-language workshops)
- assessment-templates/module-completion-report.md: Module completion package template
- assessment-templates/risk-register-example.md: 8 fully populated risk entries (Meridian Logistics GmbH fictional engagement)
- playbooks/privileged-access-architecture.md: Module 13 - Teleport, Tailscale/Headscale, JIT access, vendor governance
- playbooks/sovereign-communications.md: Module 14 - Delta Chat chatmail relay, Matrix/Element, crisis channels

Updated documents:
- playbooks/sovereign-tool-stack.md: Added Elysium, CAExporter, E8-CAT, macOS_IntuneManagement, IntunePolicyParser, M365-Scripts; updated capability matrix and module pairings
- core/modular-engagements.md: Module 2 now includes CAExporter as first step; Module 6 includes Elysium password audit
- reference/nist-csf-mapping.md: Added back-reference to nist-csf-baseline.md
- assessment-templates/README.md: Changed Q1/Q2/Q3/Q4 to Phase 1/2/3/4, added Status column
- index.md: Registered all new documents; restructured consultant navigation into three labeled groups (1-25)
- README.md: Updated directory tree; updated Quick Start for Consultants

Czech localization pointers:
- executive-summary.md: Added Česká verze pointer
- nist-csf-baseline.md: Added Česká verze pointer
- engagement-model.md: Added note that client-facing Czech translation is planned

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-27 21:33:52 +02:00

2.9 KiB

Assessment Templates

"What gets measured gets managed. What gets managed honestly becomes antifragile."

This directory contains diagnostic tools, maturity models, and assessment resources for evaluating organizational antifragility. Two production-ready tools are available now; additional assessments are in active development.

Planned Assessments

1. Antifragile Maturity Model (AF-MM)

A five-level maturity model covering:

  • Level 1: Fragile — Reactive, undocumented, dependent on single vendors
  • Level 2: Robust — Documented, monitored, but static
  • Level 3: Resilient — Automated recovery, tested backups, incident response operational
  • Level 4: Adaptive — Chaos engineering, continuous learning, structural improvement from failure
  • Level 5: Antifragile — Volatility is exploited for gain, optionality is strategic, intelligence is sovereign

2. AI Sovereignty Readiness Assessment

Evaluates:

  • Current AI usage inventory completeness
  • Data classification and leakage risk
  • Local infrastructure readiness
  • Vendor dependency and exit feasibility
  • Regulatory compliance posture

3. T0 Asset Discovery Scanner

Planned scripted assessment to:

  • Enumerate critical assets across on-premises and cloud environments
  • Classify assets by tier based on dependency mapping
  • Identify gaps in protection, monitoring, and recovery
  • Generate prioritized remediation roadmap

4. Dependency Risk Mapper

Planned tool to:

  • Map vendor and technology dependencies
  • Calculate coupling depth and exit difficulty
  • Identify hidden single points of failure
  • Simulate failure cascades

5. Incident Learning Index

Measures the organization's ability to convert incidents into structural improvements:

  • Mean time to structural fix
  • Post-mortem completion rate
  • Structural changes implemented per incident
  • Repeat incident rate

Development Roadmap

Phases are sequenced by client impact, not calendar quarter. Dates are assigned at the start of each development cycle.

Phase Deliverable Format Status
1 AF-MM v1.0 — Antifragile Maturity Model questionnaire and scoring guide Markdown + spreadsheet Planned
2 AI Sovereignty Readiness Assessment v1.0 Interactive web form or CLI tool Planned
3 T0 Asset Discovery Scanner v0.1 — cloud APIs + on-premises enumeration Python script Planned
4 Dependency Risk Mapper v0.1 — vendor coupling depth and failure cascade simulation Python + network analysis Planned

Contributing

When adding new assessments:

  1. Document the purpose, methodology, and limitations
  2. Include scoring rubrics with clear criteria
  3. Provide sample outputs and interpretation guidance
  4. Version assessments and maintain changelogs
  5. Test on at least two different organizational profiles before release

Return to Repository Index