mirror of
https://github.com/chatmail/relay.git
synced 2026-05-12 00:54:37 +00:00
docs: Add architectural information about deployer classes
- Updated overview.rst to describe the Deployer class hierarchy and the motivations behind it.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -297,3 +297,69 @@ actually it is a problem with your TLS certificate.
|
||||
.. _nginx: https://nginx.org
|
||||
.. _pyinfra: https://pyinfra.com
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Architecture of cmdeploy
|
||||
------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
cmdeploy is a Python program that uses the pyinfra library to deploy
|
||||
chatmail relays, with all the necessary software, configuration, and
|
||||
services. The deployment process performs three primary types of
|
||||
operation:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Installation of software, universal across all deployments.
|
||||
2. Configuration of software, with deploy-specific variations.
|
||||
3. Activation of services.
|
||||
|
||||
The process is implemented through a family of "deployer" objects
|
||||
which all derive from a common ``Deployer`` base class, defined in
|
||||
cmdeploy/src/cmdeploy/deployer.py. Each object provides
|
||||
implementation methods for the three stages -- install, configure, and
|
||||
activate. The top-level procedure in ``deploy_chatmail()`` calls
|
||||
these methods for all the deployer objects, first calling all the
|
||||
install methods, then the configure methods, then the activate
|
||||
methods.
|
||||
|
||||
The base class also implements support for a CMDEPLOY_STAGES
|
||||
environment variable, which allows limiting the process to specific
|
||||
stages. Note that some deployers are stateful between the stages
|
||||
(this is one reason why they are implemented as objects), and that
|
||||
state will not get propagated between stages when run in separate
|
||||
invocations of cmdeploy. This environment variable is intended for
|
||||
use in future revisions to support building Docker images with
|
||||
software pre-installed, and configuration of containers at run time
|
||||
from environmnet variables.
|
||||
|
||||
The ``install_impl()`` method for the deployer classes is static, to
|
||||
ensure that it does not rely on any object state, in particular, the
|
||||
configuration details of the deployment. This helps ensure that all
|
||||
install methods are suitable for running as part of a container image
|
||||
build.
|
||||
|
||||
Operations that start services for systemd-based deployments should
|
||||
only be called from the ``activate_impl()`` methods. These methods
|
||||
will not be called in non-systemd container environments.
|
||||
|
||||
Deployer objects
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
One might ask why the deployers are implemented as object classes, as
|
||||
opposed to callable functions or the like. There are various reasons
|
||||
why objects are a good fit for the deployment process.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Objects provide a way to organize the install, configure, and
|
||||
deploy operations for each component that is installed, supporting a
|
||||
"driver" type of pattern. This could be implemented in other ways
|
||||
without objects, such as function jump tables, but objects provide a
|
||||
clean and formalized way to do essentially the same thing.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Class inheritance provides a natural way to define
|
||||
component-specific operations for the various stages of deployment, by
|
||||
overriding the no-op stub methods in the base class. The base class
|
||||
handles policy decisions about which stages are to be executed,
|
||||
ensuring consistent handling of the stages in a central location.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Some of the components track state between stages, basing decisions
|
||||
like whether to restart a service on whether the software or
|
||||
configuration of that service was changed in an earlier stage.
|
||||
Keeping track of state between method calls is an ideal use case for
|
||||
objects.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user