Add docs governance and Czech parity updates

LICENSE_FAQ.md

@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+# Kosmic License (KΛ-1.0) - Compatibility and Interpretation FAQ
+
+Plain-language guidance for using materials licensed under `KΛ-1.0`.
+
+This FAQ is a project interpretation aid, not legal advice.
+When stakes are high, consult qualified legal counsel.
+
+## 1. What does KΛ-1.0 require at minimum?
+
+For reuse or derivatives, keep all of the following:
+
+- visible attribution to Church of Kosmo
+- reference to `KΛ-1.0`
+- open/shareable downstream distribution under the same or a compatible license
+- no use that promotes violence, misinformation, or destruction of life/ecosystems
+
+## 2. What attribution format should I use?
+
+Use the canonical notice from `LICENSE.md`:
+
+> Based on materials from the Church of Kosmo, shared under the Kosmic License (KΛ 1.0).
+
+Recommended attribution package:
+
+1. Include the canonical notice above.
+2. Link to the source repository or source document.
+3. State whether you modified the content (for example: "adapted", "translated", "edited").
+4. Include a link or copy of the license text.
+
+Example (Markdown):
+
+```markdown
+Based on materials from the Church of Kosmo, shared under the Kosmic License (KΛ 1.0).
+Source: https://git.cqre.net/kosmo/Church-of-Kosmo
+Changes: Czech translation and formatting edits.
+License: ./LICENSE.md
+```
+
+## 3. What counts as a derivative?
+
+Typical derivatives include:
+
+- translations
+- edited or rearranged versions of texts
+- excerpts embedded into new guides or publications
+- adaptations into visual, audio, or educational formats
+
+If in doubt, treat your output as a derivative and include full attribution.
+
+## 4. What does "same or compatible license" mean here?
+
+Project interpretation of compatibility:
+
+- preserves attribution requirements
+- keeps derivatives open/shareable (no downstream lock-up)
+- does not remove ethical-use constraints of KΛ-1.0
+- does not claim exclusive ownership of material derived from KΛ-1.0 sources
+
+Likely incompatible patterns:
+
+- all-rights-reserved redistribution of derivatives
+- no-derivatives terms on adapted KΛ-1.0 material
+- licenses that allow removing attribution
+- relicensing that strips ethical stewardship constraints
+
+## 5. Is commercial use allowed?
+
+Yes, but with explicit boundaries from `LICENSE.md`:
+
+- commercial activity must align with ecological and ethical balance
+- materials must not be used for harm, exploitation, or misinformation
+- profits should contribute to education, preservation, or renewal in spirit with the Codex
+
+Practical check before commercial use:
+
+1. Can you clearly document attribution and open-share obligations?
+2. Can you explain ecological/social impact of the use?
+3. Are you avoiding harmful, deceptive, or extractive outcomes?
+4. Is part of value returned to education/preservation/renewal?
+
+If any answer is "no", stop and revise.
+
+## 6. How should mixed-license projects handle KΛ-1.0 content?
+
+If your project combines multiple licenses:
+
+- keep KΛ-1.0 covered material clearly identified
+- retain KΛ-1.0 terms for that portion
+- avoid combinations that block attribution or open-share obligations
+
+If terms conflict, do not distribute until the conflict is resolved.
+
+## 7. Does this FAQ replace LICENSE.md?
+
+No.
+`LICENSE.md` is authoritative.
+This file only clarifies practical interpretation for contributors and reusers.
+