Files
Church-of-Kosmo/LICENSE_FAQ.md
Tomas Kracmar 9ee5acfa4f
Some checks failed
Docs Check / lint-and-links (push) Has been cancelled
Docs Check / translation-parity (push) Has been cancelled
Add docs governance and Czech parity updates
2026-03-26 17:12:39 +01:00

99 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown

# Kosmic License (KΛ-1.0) - Compatibility and Interpretation FAQ
Plain-language guidance for using materials licensed under `KΛ-1.0`.
This FAQ is a project interpretation aid, not legal advice.
When stakes are high, consult qualified legal counsel.
## 1. What does KΛ-1.0 require at minimum?
For reuse or derivatives, keep all of the following:
- visible attribution to Church of Kosmo
- reference to `KΛ-1.0`
- open/shareable downstream distribution under the same or a compatible license
- no use that promotes violence, misinformation, or destruction of life/ecosystems
## 2. What attribution format should I use?
Use the canonical notice from `LICENSE.md`:
> Based on materials from the Church of Kosmo, shared under the Kosmic License (KΛ 1.0).
Recommended attribution package:
1. Include the canonical notice above.
2. Link to the source repository or source document.
3. State whether you modified the content (for example: "adapted", "translated", "edited").
4. Include a link or copy of the license text.
Example (Markdown):
```markdown
Based on materials from the Church of Kosmo, shared under the Kosmic License (KΛ 1.0).
Source: https://git.cqre.net/kosmo/Church-of-Kosmo
Changes: Czech translation and formatting edits.
License: ./LICENSE.md
```
## 3. What counts as a derivative?
Typical derivatives include:
- translations
- edited or rearranged versions of texts
- excerpts embedded into new guides or publications
- adaptations into visual, audio, or educational formats
If in doubt, treat your output as a derivative and include full attribution.
## 4. What does "same or compatible license" mean here?
Project interpretation of compatibility:
- preserves attribution requirements
- keeps derivatives open/shareable (no downstream lock-up)
- does not remove ethical-use constraints of KΛ-1.0
- does not claim exclusive ownership of material derived from KΛ-1.0 sources
Likely incompatible patterns:
- all-rights-reserved redistribution of derivatives
- no-derivatives terms on adapted KΛ-1.0 material
- licenses that allow removing attribution
- relicensing that strips ethical stewardship constraints
## 5. Is commercial use allowed?
Yes, but with explicit boundaries from `LICENSE.md`:
- commercial activity must align with ecological and ethical balance
- materials must not be used for harm, exploitation, or misinformation
- profits should contribute to education, preservation, or renewal in spirit with the Codex
Practical check before commercial use:
1. Can you clearly document attribution and open-share obligations?
2. Can you explain ecological/social impact of the use?
3. Are you avoiding harmful, deceptive, or extractive outcomes?
4. Is part of value returned to education/preservation/renewal?
If any answer is "no", stop and revise.
## 6. How should mixed-license projects handle KΛ-1.0 content?
If your project combines multiple licenses:
- keep KΛ-1.0 covered material clearly identified
- retain KΛ-1.0 terms for that portion
- avoid combinations that block attribution or open-share obligations
If terms conflict, do not distribute until the conflict is resolved.
## 7. Does this FAQ replace LICENSE.md?
No.
`LICENSE.md` is authoritative.
This file only clarifies practical interpretation for contributors and reusers.